From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Berry Petroleum Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02227-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02227-RPM

11-09-2011

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., Plaintiff, v. BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Keith D. Tooley

Joseph Pierzchala

Steven J. Merker

Scott P. Sinor

COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Motion for Protective Order 8:56 a.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks and states its introductory remarks regarding the issue before it.

Argument by Mr. Merker.

Argument by Mr. Tooley.

Counsel agree with court's suggestions as stated on record.

Court reiterates industry practice is not part of the case.

ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Protective Order to Quash Chevron's Rule 30(b)(6)

Deposition Notice [42] is resolved and counsel are to proceed as suggested on record. Counsel are permitted, after conferring, additional written discovery (interrogatories).

Written discovery and expert report deadlines may be extended for the limited purpose as stated on record.

10:25 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 29 min.


Summaries of

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Berry Petroleum Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 9, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02227-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Berry Petroleum Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., Plaintiff, v. BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02227-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 9, 2011)