From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chevrolet Co. v. Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1940
8 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1940)

Opinion

(Filed 10 April, 1940.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Cowper, Special Judge, at January Term, 1940, of CALDWELL. No error.

Pritchett Strickland for plaintiff, appellant.

Max C. Wilson for defendant, appellee.


From judgment on verdict in favor of defendant J. C. Edmisten, plaintiff appealed.


Plaintiff instituted action on a note which it was alleged defendant J. C. Edmisten had endorsed. This defendant denied that he had endorsed the note, or authorized anyone to sign his name thereto. The jury accepted the defendant's version of the transaction and rendered verdict in his favor. On the record, we find no ruling of the court below which would justify setting aside the verdict and judgment. The plaintiff's assignments of error cannot be sustained.

No error.


Summaries of

Chevrolet Co. v. Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1940
8 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1940)
Case details for

Chevrolet Co. v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:FRYE CHEVROLET COMPANY, INC., v. O. J. HOLDER, COLINE S. EDMISTEN AND J…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1940

Citations

8 S.E.2d 239 (N.C. 1940)
217 N.C. 794