From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chestnut v. Pa. State Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 19, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0579 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0579

12-19-2012

JEFFREY CHESTNUT, a/k/a Dwight Johnson, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Respondents.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)


ORDER

NOW, this 19th day of December, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Blewitt (Doc. 15) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is ADOPTED.
(2) The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
(3) A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE.
(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.

______________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Chestnut v. Pa. State Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 19, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0579 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Chestnut v. Pa. State Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY CHESTNUT, a/k/a Dwight Johnson, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:CV-12-0579 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)