Case No. EDCV 18-0093-JPR
07-10-2018
CARL CHESTER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL CARR, Warden, Respondent.
Pursuant to the Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Motion to Supplement, Granting Motion to Dismiss, and Dismissing Action,
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed. DATED: July 10, 2018
/s/_________
JEAN ROSENBLUTH
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Full title:CARL CHESTER, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL CARR, Warden, Respondent.
Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Date published: Jul 10, 2018
As such, these claims do not fall within “the core of habeas corpus” and Petitioner must instead pursue these…
Irvis v. DoererThus, it appears that this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider Petitioner's challenge to the BOP's…