From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Chester Rolling Mills v. Vessels “Hopatcong” & “Musconetcong,”

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1892
133 N.Y. 694 (N.Y. 1892)

Opinion

Submitted June 7, 1892

Decided June 17, 1892

Henry Schmitt for appellants.

Harvey Weed for respondent.


Agree to affirm; no opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Claim of Chester Rolling Mills v. Vessels “Hopatcong” & “Musconetcong,”

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 17, 1892
133 N.Y. 694 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for

Claim of Chester Rolling Mills v. Vessels “Hopatcong” & “Musconetcong,”

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of the CHESTER ROLLING MILLS, Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 17, 1892

Citations

133 N.Y. 694 (N.Y. 1892)
45 N.Y. St. Rptr. 934