From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chester Airport, Inc. v. Aeroflex Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1963
18 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

March 26, 1963


Order, entered on November 29, 1962, granting summary judgment to plaintiff, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of providing in the first and third decretal paragraphs that plaintiff is entitled to and shall recover for unpaid rent owing and in default up to June, 1962 on the first cause of action; and said order is otherwise affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. It is undisputed that the new tenant took possession in June, 1962, and plaintiff is entitled to recover for unpaid rent pursuant to the first cause of action only until that date ( Sagamore Corp. v. Willcutt, 120 Conn. 315).

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. [ 37 Misc.2d 145.]


Summaries of

Chester Airport, Inc. v. Aeroflex Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 26, 1963
18 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Chester Airport, Inc. v. Aeroflex Corporation

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER AIRPORT, INC., Respondent, v. AEROFLEX CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 26, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
238 N.Y.S.2d 715

Citing Cases

Matter of Ollag Const. Equipment Corp.

The court stated: "To be sure, an appellate court must respect findings of the trial judge as to what in fact…

In re Levine

There have been several cases construing the requirement that past consideration be expressed in the writing.…