From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chestang v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
CIV S-07-1173 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

CIV S-07-1173 LKK GGH P.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


Respondent has requested a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to file Respondent's response to Petitioner's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner does not oppose an extension. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondent is granted an extension of time to and including June 24, 2008, in which to file a response to Petitioner's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.


Summaries of

Chestang v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 30, 2008
CIV S-07-1173 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Chestang v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL K. CHESTANG, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

CIV S-07-1173 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 30, 2008)