From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chess v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 31, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1639 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1639 LKK KJM P.

August 31, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 29, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 29, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants Emery and Boutt are dismissed without prejudice.See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Chess v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 31, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1639 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Chess v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CHESS, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 31, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1639 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2009)