From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chesley v. City of Mesquite

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 21, 2022
2:21-cv-01946-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01946-GMN-DJA

01-21-2022

JOSEPH MAQUADE CHESLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MESQUITE, a government entity, AARON BAKER, an individual, BARBARA ELLESTAD, an individual, DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 300; and ROE BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1 through 300, inclusive, Defendants.

PHILIP J. TRENCHAK, ESQ. VICTORIA C. MULLINS, ESQ. Mullins & Trenchak, Attorneys at Law Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar No. 13582 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC Philip J. Trenchak, NV Bar No. 009924 MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTYS AT LAW Attorney for Plaintiff, MaQuade Chesley Attorneys for Defendant Barbara Ellestad Marc Randazza, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12265 Leslie Gutierrez An employee of Mullins & Trenchak


PHILIP J. TRENCHAK, ESQ.

VICTORIA C. MULLINS, ESQ.

Mullins & Trenchak, Attorneys at Law

Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar No. 13582 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC

Philip J. Trenchak, NV Bar No. 009924 MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTYS AT LAW

Attorney for Plaintiff, MaQuade Chesley

Attorneys for Defendant Barbara Ellestad

Marc Randazza, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12265

Leslie Gutierrez An employee of Mullins & Trenchak

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS [DKT. 16] (SECOND REQUEST)

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, MAQUADE CHESLEY and Defendant Barbara Ellestad, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to this Court's approval, to extend the date by which Plaintiff may file his Response to Defendant Barbara Ellestad's Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to NRS 41.660 (Dkt. No. 16) from January 21, 2022 to February 4, 2022. This is the second request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file his response.

Good cause exists to grant the requested extension, as Plaintiffs Counsel tested positive for Covid on January 17, 2022. This stipulation is being made in good faith, without the intention to delay or harass.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 20th day of January, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Stipulation To Extend time to file a Response brief to Defendant's Special Motion to Dismiss Defendant Barbara Ellestad Pursuant to NRS 41.660 (Dkt. No. 16) to was electronically served through the Court's electronic filing system addressed to the following:


Summaries of

Chesley v. City of Mesquite

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 21, 2022
2:21-cv-01946-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Chesley v. City of Mesquite

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MAQUADE CHESLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MESQUITE, a…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 21, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-01946-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)