Opinion
2:21-cv-01946-GMN-DJA
01-06-2022
JOSEPH MAQUADE CHESLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MESQUITE, a government entity, AARON BAKER, an individual, BARBARA ELLESTAD, an individual, DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 300; and ROE BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1 through 300, inclusive, Defendants.
Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar No. 13582 RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC Attorneys for Defendant Barbara Ellestad Philip J. Trenchak, NV Bar No. 009924 MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTYS AT LAW Attorneys for Plaintiff, MaQuade Chesley
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BARBARA ELLESTAD WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(2) [DKT. 20]
Alex J. Shepard, NV Bar No. 13582
RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC
Attorneys for Defendant
Barbara Ellestad
Philip J. Trenchak, NV Bar No. 009924
MULLINS & TRENCHAK, ATTYS AT LAW
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
MaQuade Chesley
Plaintiff, MAQUADE CHESLEY and Defendant Barbara Ellestad, by and through then-respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to this Court's approval, to extend the date by which Plaintiff may file his Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendant Barbara Ellestad Without Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 20) from January 5, 2022 to January 7, 2022. This is the first request for an extension of time to file a Reply to Defendant Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendant Barbara Ellestad without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).
This stipulation is being made in good faith, without the intention to delay or harass.
IT IS SO ORDERED.