From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chesapeake House v. Lee Mutual Ins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 15, 1970
239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 69-572.

September 11, 1970. Rehearing Denied October 15, 1970.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, Archie M. Odom, J.

A.N. Spence, Miami, for appellant.

Robert T. Shafer, Jr., and James A. Franklin, Jr., of Henderson, Franklin, Starnes Holt, Fort Myers, for appellee.


An insurance broker is not, as a matter of law, the insured's agent for receipt of premium refund upon cancellation. Hermann v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 1885, 100 N.Y. 411, 3 N.E. 341. Whether the broker is agent as a matter of fact is not determined by the record on which summary judgment was entered. Agency, pleaded here, is yet to be determined. Miller v. Chase Co., 1924, 88 Fla. 500, 102 So. 553. See 44 C.J.S. Insurance § 168; 44 Am.Jur.2d Insurance § 151 et seq.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C.J., and LILES, J., concur.


Summaries of

Chesapeake House v. Lee Mutual Ins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 15, 1970
239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

Chesapeake House v. Lee Mutual Ins

Case Details

Full title:CHESAPEAKE HOUSE, INC., APPELLANT, v. LEE MUTUAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 15, 1970

Citations

239 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Citing Cases

McFarling v. Demco, Inc.

As many jurisdictions have said, it is a factual question as to whether a broker is the agent of the insured…