From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chervonyy v. Jefferson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 2007
45 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-00764.

November 20, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Linda C. Sims appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated November 20, 2006, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her and granted the plaintiffs' cross motion to extend their time to serve her with process.

James G. Bilello, Westbury, N.Y. (Patricia McDonagh of counsel), for appellant.

Gratt Associates, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Alexandra Mishail and Kevin Dana Gratt of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Fisher, Lifson and Carni, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs' cross motion to extend their time to serve the defendant Linda C. Sims ( see Rosenzweig v 600 N. St., LLC, 35 AD3d 705; Robles v Mirzakhmedov, 34 AD3d 554; cf. Slate v Schiavone Constr. Co., 4 NY3d 816; Valentin v Zaltsman, 39 AD3d 852). Sims's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her was properly denied because the determination granting the plaintiffs' cross motion rendered the motion academic.


Summaries of

Chervonyy v. Jefferson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 2007
45 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Chervonyy v. Jefferson

Case Details

Full title:YURIY CHERVONYY et al., Respondents, v. LAWRENCE T. JEFFERSON et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9193
846 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

WU/LH 36 Midland, LLC v. Levinson

It has been held that when the time to serve has expired and a plaintiff cross-moves for an extension, a…