From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cherry v. Pro-Solutions for Chiropractic

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-1692, Doc. No. 14 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-1692, Doc. No. 14.

September 22, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December 11, 2007, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30), filed on August 17, 2009, recommended that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges, that they had ten (10) days to file any objections. Plaintiff filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 3, 2009.

After review of the pleadings, briefs, and other documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 14) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Pro-Solutions for Chiropractic, Inc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 30) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated August 17, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mark this case as closed.


Summaries of

Cherry v. Pro-Solutions for Chiropractic

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-1692, Doc. No. 14 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Cherry v. Pro-Solutions for Chiropractic

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN CHERRY, Plaintiff, v. PRO-SOLUTIONS FOR CHIROPRACTIC, INC. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 22, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-1692, Doc. No. 14 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Pro-Solutions for Chiropractic

Cherry filed a substantially similar complaint in December 2007. The District Court granted defendant…

Romdhani v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Thus, there is no reason why the statement [the affiants] testified to during [their] sworn testimony at…