Summary
dismissing IIED claim where the plaintiff made a conclusory allegation that the defendant's conduct caused "extreme emotional distress" but failed to allege how the distress manifested itself
Summary of this case from Prater v. Trs. of the Hamline Univ. of Minn.Opinion
CIVIL 22-2012 (JRT/JFD)
02-03-2023
CHARLES SAMUEL CHERRY, Plaintiff, v. MCF-MOOSE LAKE; OFFICER ADRIANA BOOKER; UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR; SGT. MARC MAGNUSON; LT. RICH SKOGLUND, Defendants.
Charles Samuel Cherry, OID# 263681, pro se plaintiff.
Charles Samuel Cherry, OID# 263681, pro se plaintiff.
ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Magistrate Judge John R. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation on January 17, 2023 (ECF No. 11). No party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff Charles Samuel Cherry's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, except his Eighth Amendment claim against Officer Booker for sexual harassment.