From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cherfils v. Jones

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 25, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:07cv391/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:07cv391/MCR/MD.

March 25, 2008


ORDER


Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 2, 2008, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cherfils v. Jones

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 25, 2008
CASE NO.: 3:07cv391/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Cherfils v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CHERFILS, Plaintiff, v. SGT. JONES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:07cv391/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pete's Towing Co. v. City of Tampa, Florida

See Complaint ¶ 3 ("Plaintiff is a Florida corporation").See King v. Olmsted County, 117 F.3d 1065, 1067 (8th…

Copemann v. Fundenburg

Even threatening language does not generally state a constitutional claim under § 1983. Woods v. Valentino,…