From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1989
150 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 11, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.).


Pursuant to paragraph 4 (b) of the mortgage extension agreement herein, plaintiff obligated itself to pay "all reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements incurred or owed by Mortgagee in respect of anything related to or arising out of this Mortgage and/or Mortgage Note and Agreement before or after the Extended Due Date." Since the instant litigation was clearly "in respect of anything related to or arising out of" the mortgage and mortgage extension agreement, defendants are entitled to reasonable counsel fees.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 11, 1989
150 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner

Case Details

Full title:CHELSEA/22 ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. HERBERT FLEISSNER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 11, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 815

Citing Cases

Vacation Vlg. Homeowners' Assn. v. Mordkofsky

In the event the Member does not pay the assessment * * * said Member shall be liable for the Association's *…

Sirota v. Langtry

In their previously dismissed causes of action ( see, Sirota v. Langtry, 204 A.D.2d 1009, lv dismissed 84…