From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheeseboro v. N.Y. City Housing Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 2008
55 A.D.3d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4363.

October 23, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered December 12, 2007, which denied defendant New York City Housing Authority's motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for failure to appear for an oral examination pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to direct that plaintiff submit to a section 50-h hearing within 30 days of service of a copy of this order, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Lester Schwab Katz Dwyer, LLP, New York (John Sandercock of counsel), for appellant.

Miller Eisenman, LLP, New York (Lee Miller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.


Denial of defendant's motion was appropriate, where plaintiffs scheduled section 50-h hearing was adjourned on consent.

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Cheeseboro v. N.Y. City Housing Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 23, 2008
55 A.D.3d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Cheeseboro v. N.Y. City Housing Auth

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. CHEESEBORO, JR., Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 23, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8006
864 N.Y.S.2d 919

Citing Cases

Hamid v. City of N.Y.

As such, on the record before this court, plaintiff has made a sufficient showing to establish an excuse for…

Estate of Fogarty v. Town of Southold

"Generally, a plaintiff who has failed to comply with a demand for a hearing ... is precluded from commencing…