From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheema v. Chaudhary

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52059 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Opinion

2008-1456 N C.

Decided October 6, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, Second District (Howard S. Miller, J.), entered September 14, 2006. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: MOLIA, J.P., NICOLAI and TANENBAUM, JJ.


In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover $5,000 from defendant for business expenses incurred by Kings Plaza Petroleum, Inc. Plaintiff asserted that his right to recover these expenses from defendant was based on certain terms set forth in an agreement for the sale of shares in Kings Plaza Petroleum, Inc. from defendant to plaintiff. After a nonjury trial, the District Court dismissed the action.

Upon a review of the record, we find that substantial justice was done between the parties in accordance with the rules and principles of substantive law (UDCA 1807). All of the documentary evidence submitted by plaintiff in support of his claim for damages consisted of bills or invoices made out to "Azan's Market Inc." or similarly named entities. Plaintiff failed to prove by testimony or documentary evidence that there was any agreement between the parties regarding such a corporation. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing the action is affirmed.

Molia, J.P., Nicolai and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cheema v. Chaudhary

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2009
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52059 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
Case details for

Cheema v. Chaudhary

Case Details

Full title:ZIAULLAH CHEEMA, Appellant, v. QAISER CHAUDHARY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2009

Citations

2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 52059 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
901 N.Y.S.2d 905