From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheek v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Oct 17, 2008
No. 03-08-00540-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. 03-08-00540-CR

Filed: October 17, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Comal County, No. 2006CR1866, Honorable Charles A. Stephens Ii, Judge Presiding. Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction.

Before Justices PATTERSON, WALDROP and HENSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Christopher Cheek seeks to appeal his conviction for driving while license suspended. Sentence was suspended on June 10, 2008, but the notice of appeal was not filed until August 13, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). In the notice of appeal, Cheek's counsel acknowledges that the notice was not timely, but urges that "[t]he plan was to file a notice, but trial counsel became very sick and pre-occupied" with other matters. When a notice of appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Cheek may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal under the circumstances, but he must seek it by means of a post-conviction habeas corpus petition. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072 (West 2005). The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Cheek v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Oct 17, 2008
No. 03-08-00540-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Cheek v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Cheek, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Oct 17, 2008

Citations

No. 03-08-00540-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ex parte McCarty

072 when an appeal was not timely filed. See, e.g., State v. Burnett, No. 05-13-00247-CR, 2013 Tex. App.…