From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheatam v. JCPenney Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-72 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-72

09-08-2016

ETHEL CHEATAM, Plaintiff, v. JCPENNEY CO., INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case was referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters pursuant to General Order 05-07. Pending before the court are two motions to dismiss, the first filed by JCPenney Co., Inc. ("JCPenney"), and the second filed jointly by several individual Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 9, 11). The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, which recommends that the court deny JCPenney's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claims, grant both JCPenney and the individual Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiff's defamation claims (but allow Plaintiff leave to amend), and grant the individual Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice Plaintiff's Title VII claims against them in their individual capacities. (Doc. No. 17). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for so doing has passed.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED. JCPenney and the individual Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part in accordance with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Plaintiff shall have fourteen (14) days from entry of this order by which to amend her complaint to state her defamation claims with sufficient particularity as set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 8th day of September, 2016.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cheatam v. JCPenney Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 8, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-72 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Cheatam v. JCPenney Co.

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL CHEATAM, Plaintiff, v. JCPENNEY CO., INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 8, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-72 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2016)

Citing Cases

NSK Ltd. v. Intercontinental Terminals Co. (In re Intercontinental Terminals Co. Deer Park Fire Litig.)

Moreover, while a claim for business disparagement is not subject to the heightened pleading requirements of…