From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cheam v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 18650-17 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)

Opinion

18650-17 6783-18 24734-18 18050-19

06-10-2021

Kevin B. Cheam & Julie Lim, et al Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent


ORDER

Joseph W. Nega Judge

On February 23, 2021, R. Todd Luoma and Betty J. Williams, who have been counsel for petitioners, each filed separate motions to withdraw as counsel of record for petitioners Kevin B. Cheam and Julie Lim, and petitioners Lundy Nath Tanya Nath, in each of these cases. Petitioners were ordered to respond to these motions to withdraw by March 29, 2021. To date, the petitioners have not filed a response. These cases were called from the calendar of the Court's Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Trial Session, conducted remotely on June 7, 2021. There was no appearance by the petitioners. Mr. Luoma, Ms. Williams and counsel for respondent appeared and were heard. Upon due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that R. Todd Luoma's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed February 23, 2021, is granted. It is further

ORDERED that Betty J. Williams' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel filed February 23, 2021, is granted.


Summaries of

Cheam v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 10, 2021
No. 18650-17 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Cheam v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Kevin B. Cheam & Julie Lim, et al Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 10, 2021

Citations

No. 18650-17 (U.S.T.C. Jun. 10, 2021)