From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chay v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 30, 2018
NO. 01-18-00646-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 01-18-00646-CV

08-30-2018

PEDRO CHAY, MARIO SOTO, AND DAVID BONITO, Appellants v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY, L.P. AND PETER JOHNSON, Appellees


On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2017-64561

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Pedro Chay, Mario Soto, and David Bonito, have neither established indigence for purposes of appellate costs nor arranged to pay the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145, TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Lloyd.


Summaries of

Chay v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 30, 2018
NO. 01-18-00646-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Chay v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO CHAY, MARIO SOTO, AND DAVID BONITO, Appellants v. PENSKE TRUCK…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Aug 30, 2018

Citations

NO. 01-18-00646-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2018)