From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chavez v. School Construction Consultants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 16, 2001.

June 11, 2001.

In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant in Action No. 2 appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated January 21, 2000, as, upon granting that branch of the motion of the defendant in Action No. 1, in which it joined, to consolidate the actions, denied that branch of the motion which was to place venue of the consolidated action in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.

Marshall, Conway Wright, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven L. Sonkin of counsel), for appellant.

Weinstein, Chayt Chase, P.C. (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Jules G. Messinger and Brian J. Isaac] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion is granted in its entirety, and the Clerk of Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to transfer the file of Action No. 1 to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, and the Clerk of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, is directed to consolidate the file of Action No. 2 into Action No. 1.

Since the language of CPLR 504 is couched in mandatory terms, and the plaintiffs failed to show the existence of "compelling countervailing circumstances" (see, Chetrick v. Cohen, 266 A.D.2d 254; Ruiz v. City of New York, 195 A.D.2d 327; Rogers v. U-Haul Co., 161 A.D.2d 214), the Supreme Court, Kings County, improvidently exercised its discretion in retaining jurisdiction of the consolidated action, and denying that branch of the motion which was to transfer venue of the consolidated action to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (see, CPLR 504; Chetrick v. Cohen, supra; Ruiz v. City of New York, supra; cf., Manshul Constr. Corp. v. Sawyers Glass Corp., 242 A.D.2d 262; Champion v. City of New York, 203 A.D.2d 508; Yasgour v. City of New York, 169 A.D.2d 673).


Summaries of

Chavez v. School Construction Consultants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 11, 2001
284 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Chavez v. School Construction Consultants

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO CHAVEZ, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 11, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 563

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. City of New York

Here, absent any dispute that plaintiff's claims against defendants arose in Bronx County, venue is proper…

Hernandez v. City of New York

Moreover, defendants demonstrate no special or compelling circumstances that would justify a deviation from…