§

Chavez v. Martinez

No. CIV 07-1250 JB/LFG (D.N.M. Oct. 20, 2008)
Chavez v. Martinez

3 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Yazzie

    No. CR 10-1761 JB (D.N.M. May. 6, 2014)

    See 133 F.3d at 1360. In Chavez v. Martinez, No. CIV 07-1250 JB/LFG, 2008 WL 6045509 (D.N.M. Oct. 20, 2008)(Browning, J.), the Court considered whether the defendant, an officer, violated the plaintiff's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when the defendant went to the plaintiff's doctor's office to verify the dates on the plaintiff's doctor's note. See 2008 WL 6045509, at *1-2.

  2. United States v. Yazzie

    998 F. Supp. 2d 1044 (D.N.M. 2014)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the United States would be prejudiced by the withdrawal of the defendant's guilty plea for sexual abuse of his two minor stepdaughters when, in the intervening time, the children had grown "more concerned about losing a member of their household and are rethinking their desire to testify against [the defendant]"

    In Chavez v. Martinez, No. CIV 07–1250 JB/LFG, 2008 WL 6045509 (D.N.M. Oct. 20, 2008)(Browning, J.), the Court considered whether the defendant, an officer, violated the plaintiff's Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights when the defendant went to the plaintiff's doctor's office to verify the dates on the plaintiff's doctor's note. See2008 WL 6045509, at *1–2

  3. Kerns v. Board of Commissioners of Bernalillo County

    707 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D.N.M. 2010)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that the plaintiff could not maintain an action under the Privacy Act against the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department, a local entity, because the Privacy Act applies only to agencies of the federal government

    See Tr. at 135:6-25 (Lowry). Mr. Lowry further argued that there is no implied waiver in this case, like there was in the Court's decision in Chavez v. Martinez, No. CIV 07-1250, 2008 WL 6045509, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108932 (D.N.M. Oct. 20, 2008) (Browning, J.). See Tr. at 140:23-25 (Lowry).