From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaudoin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 13, 2005
901 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC02-2728.

April 13, 2005.

Lower Tribunal No. 5D02-3176.


As petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chaudoin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 13, 2005
901 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Chaudoin v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL SAGE CHAUDOIN, JR., Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 13, 2005

Citations

901 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2005)