From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Solano County Jail

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. 2:04-cv-2655-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-2655-MCE-GGH-P.

August 29, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 30, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 30, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Chatman v. Solano County Jail

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. 2:04-cv-2655-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Chatman v. Solano County Jail

Case Details

Full title:LARRY A. CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-2655-MCE-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

Chatman v. Diaz

Three of the cases were dismissed when plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, after the district…

Chatman v. Diaz

II. DISCUSSIONThe Court takes judicial notice of four of Plaintiff's prior actions that were dismissed…