From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Felker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2912 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2912 LKK EFB P

10-05-2011

CHARLES CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. TOM FELKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously ordered that dispositive motions be filed by October 2, 2011. Dckt. No. 59.

On October 1, 2011, the day before the dispositive motion deadline, defendants requested that the case be stayed for 60 days so that they may engage in further settlement negotiations with plaintiff. Dckt. No. 68. Defendants requested that the court issue a new scheduling order if the case does not settle after 60 days.

Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel discovery, which the court has not yet ruled on. See Dckt. Nos. 65, 66, 67. The ruling on the discovery motion may affect the parties' summary judgment motions.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the current deadline for dispositive motions is hereby vacated. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 21 days after the court issues its ruling on the motion to compel.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Chatman v. Felker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2912 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Chatman v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES CHATMAN, Plaintiff, v. TOM FELKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2912 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)