From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0264 KJM KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0264 KJM KJN (TEMP) P.

April 4, 2011


ORDER


On January 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations, finding that the petition in this case had been filed after the expiration of the statute of limitations, rejecting petitioner's claim that he was entitled to equitable tolling, and recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss be granted.

Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations, supported by additional medical records from the relevant period and declarations suggesting that he did not have access to his legal materials during a portion of the limitations period and that he had not prepared the pleadings filed in state and federal court during the limitations period.

In light of this substantial new material, this court declines to adopt the findings and recommendations and refers the case back to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of the impact of this new material on the findings and recommendations.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 1, 2011.


Summaries of

Chatman v. Evans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 4, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0264 KJM KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Chatman v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:LARRY A. CHATMAN, Petitioner, v. M.S. EVANS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0264 KJM KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2011)