From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0570 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0570 JAM KJN P

09-28-2021

LARRY ALONZO CHATMAN, Petitioner, v. THERESA CISNEROS, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is proceeding, without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons stated herein, petitioner's August 26, 2021 request for clarification (ECF No. 18) is deemed resolved.

On July 20, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 12.) On August 17, 2021, the undersigned directed respondent to re-serve petitioner with the motion to dismiss at his new address within five days. (ECF No. 15.) In the August 17, 2021 order, the undersigned granted petitioner thirty-five days to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (Id.)

On August 20, 2021, petitioner filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 17.) In the pending request for clarification, petitioner asks if he is required to “respond again” to respondent's motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 18.) Petitioner is informed that he is not required to file further briefing regarding respondent's motion to dismiss. Respondent's motion to dismiss is submitted for decision.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's request for clarification (ECF No. 18) is deemed resolved.


Summaries of

Chatman v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-cv-0570 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Chatman v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:LARRY ALONZO CHATMAN, Petitioner, v. THERESA CISNEROS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0570 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)