From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chatman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EasternDistrict of California
Aug 18, 2011
CASE NUMBER: 1:11at0505 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 1:11at0505

08-18-2011

VASHIKA CHATMAN, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


ORDER ON APPLICATION

TO PROCEED WITHOUT

PREPAYMENT OF FEES

Having considered the application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 USC §1915;

IT IS ORDERED that the application is:

X GRANTED.
X The clerk is directed to file the complaint.
X IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk issue summons and the United States marshal serve a copy of the complaint, summons and this order upon the defendant(s) as directed by the plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States.
[] DENIED, for the following reasons: ________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________

Dennis L. Beck

Signature of Judicial Officer

Dennis L. Beck , U.S. Magistrate Judge

Name and Title of Judicial Officer


Summaries of

Chatman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EasternDistrict of California
Aug 18, 2011
CASE NUMBER: 1:11at0505 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Chatman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VASHIKA CHATMAN, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EasternDistrict of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 1:11at0505 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2011)