From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chateau v. Lecanto Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 12, 2023
5:22-cv-129-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

5:22-cv-129-WFJ-PRL

05-12-2023

MICHAEL MARC CHATEAU, Plaintiff, v. LECANTO DETENTION CENTER, LECANTO DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL CENTER, JOHN DOES and CORE CIVIC, Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff initiated this action on March 2, 2022, by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint. (Doc. 1). On October 25, 2022, the Court identified some pleading deficiencies in the Complaint and ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 21 days. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff was warned that the failure to comply may result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Id. at 3. Plaintiff failed to comply. On December 16, 2022, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the October 25th Order. (Doc. 24). Plaintiff was warned that his failure to respond would result in the dismissal of this case without further notice. Id. Plaintiff failed to comply.

On January 13, 2023, the Court entered its Second and Final Order to Show Cause, directing Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to comply. (Doc. 29). Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the case without further notice. Id. at 2. By Order dated April 3, 2023, Plaintiff was granted an extension of time to comply, with his response to the January 13 Order due by April 24, 2023. (Doc. 33). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal without further notice. Id.

On April 25, 2023, Plaintiff filed a “Show of Cause.” (Doc. 34). This document contains three sections describing the duty of care, the breach of duty of care, and injury caused by the breach. Id. This document is not an amended complaint, nor does it comply with any of the previous orders directing Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to submit an amended complaint. See Docs. 20, 24, 29, 33. To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint as ordered on October 25, 2022.

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close this file.


Summaries of

Chateau v. Lecanto Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 12, 2023
5:22-cv-129-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Chateau v. Lecanto Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MARC CHATEAU, Plaintiff, v. LECANTO DETENTION CENTER, LECANTO…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

5:22-cv-129-WFJ-PRL (M.D. Fla. May. 12, 2023)