From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chasis v. Progressive Electronics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1962
15 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

February 27, 1962


Judgment in favor of plaintiff Herbert Chasis in the sum of $45,252, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdict vacated, and a new trial granted solely on the question of damages, with costs to abide the event. In this personal injury negligence action, on this record, the verdict is excessive. There was considerable conflict in the medical testimony with respect to injuries and the consequences thereof, and it would seem that a new trial would be a more just solution than an effort to adjust the damages to the sharply divergent possibilities that are presented. The part of the said judgment in favor of plaintiff Barbara Parker Chasis in the sum of $2,000 is reversed, on the law and on the facts, the verdict vacated, and a new trial granted, without costs, unless said plaintiff stipulates to accept $400 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, without costs. It is evident that the jury verdict is excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $400 is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.


Summaries of

Chasis v. Progressive Electronics, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1962
15 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Chasis v. Progressive Electronics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT CHASIS et al., Respondents, v. PROGRESSIVE ELECTRONICS, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1962

Citations

15 A.D.2d 776 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Woolcock v. Peter Doelger Construction Corp.

The absence of such testimony precludes effective appellate review, and it would seem that a new trial rather…