From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaseberry v. White

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 18, 2023
6:23-cv-00110 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

6:23-cv-00110

09-18-2023

Donnie Chaseberry, Plaintiff, v. FNU Dr. White, Defendant.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Donnie Chaseberry, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Thereafter, defendant FNU Dr. White filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. 16). On July 14, 2023, Judge Love issued a report and recommendation (Doc. 18), recommending that the motion be granted and that plaintiff's claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. To date, no objections have been filed, and the time period for doing so has passed.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation (Doc. 18). For the reasons stated in the report, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 16) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Chaseberry v. White

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 18, 2023
6:23-cv-00110 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Chaseberry v. White

Case Details

Full title:Donnie Chaseberry, Plaintiff, v. FNU Dr. White, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

6:23-cv-00110 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)