From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase Watch Corporation v. Heins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1940
27 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1940)

Summary

In Chase Watch, the order determined nothing finally; the creditor was merely momentarily frustrated in his collection efforts, and was forced to rely on other devices.

Summary of this case from Gotthilf v. Sills

Opinion

Argued April 9, 1940

Decided April 23, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

Abraham Karp for appellant.

Shepard Broad and Jack D. Burris for respondent.


Appeal dismissed on the ground that the order is not a final order in a special proceeding, unless the appellant applies within twenty days to the Appellate Division to resettle the order and for the certification of a question and unless thereafter such application is granted. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.


Summaries of

Chase Watch Corporation v. Heins

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 23, 1940
27 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1940)

In Chase Watch, the order determined nothing finally; the creditor was merely momentarily frustrated in his collection efforts, and was forced to rely on other devices.

Summary of this case from Gotthilf v. Sills
Case details for

Chase Watch Corporation v. Heins

Case Details

Full title:CHASE WATCH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. IRVING HEINS, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 23, 1940

Citations

27 N.E.2d 282 (N.Y. 1940)
27 N.E.2d 282

Citing Cases

Gotthilf v. Sills

12 N.Y.2d 761, 186 N.E.2d 563. See Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins, 283 N.Y. 564, 27 N.E.2d 282 (1940); cf…

Gilligan v. Tishman Realty Constr. Co.

The statute may not be construed as giving litigants with identical interests both a right of appeal and the…