From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase v. Corson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford
Dec 1, 1893
32 A. 775 (N.H. 1893)

Opinion

Decided December, 1893.

Worcester, Gafney Snow, for the plaintiffs.

George E. Cochrane, for the defendant.


ASSUMPSIT, for money paid for repairs of a steam boiler which the plaintiffs bought of the defendant. Subject to exception, the plaintiffs were permitted to amend by filing a count for a breach of the defendant's warranty of the boiler. A former owner of the boiler, called by the defendant, testified to its condition, quality, and value when the plaintiffs bought it, to its cost when new, and to the number of years it had been run. On cross-examination he was allowed to testify, subject to the defendant's exception, that he paid $175 for the boiler and some other articles. The exceptions were overruled.

WALLACE, J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Chase v. Corson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford
Dec 1, 1893
32 A. 775 (N.H. 1893)
Case details for

Chase v. Corson

Case Details

Full title:CHASE a. v. CORSON

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Strafford

Date published: Dec 1, 1893

Citations

32 A. 775 (N.H. 1893)
67 N.H. 598