From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase v. Baskerville

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 31, 2008
305 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7258.

Submitted: November 25, 2008.

Decided: December 31, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:04-cv-759-HEH).

Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, William Eugene Thro, Special Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Wesley Chase, Appellee Pro Se. Sarah Elaine Harrington, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for the United States.

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Appellants appeal the district court's order denying their motion to dismiss Appellee's Rehabilitation Act claims on the basis of sovereign immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chase v. Baskerville, 508 F.Supp.2d 492 (E.D.Va. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Chase v. Baskerville

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 31, 2008
305 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Chase v. Baskerville

Case Details

Full title:Wesley CHASE, Plaintiff-Appellee, Page 136 United States of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 31, 2008

Citations

305 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2008)