Opinion
No. 22-1164
10-25-2023
CHASE MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHNS MANVILLE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. United States of America, Amicus Curiae.
Jarod M. Bona, Luke Hasskamp, Bona Law, La Jolla, CA, Alexandra Shear, Bona Law, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Ryan Thomas Bergsieker, Gregory Joseph Kerwin, Esq., Allison Kostecka, Lydia Lulkin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee. Patrick Michael Kuhlmann, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the United States Attorney General, Washington, DC, Nickolai Gilford Levin, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae United States of America.
(D.C. No. 1:19-CV-00872-MEH) (D. Colo.) Jarod M. Bona, Luke Hasskamp, Bona Law, La Jolla, CA, Alexandra Shear, Bona Law, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Ryan Thomas Bergsieker, Gregory Joseph Kerwin, Esq., Allison Kostecka, Lydia Lulkin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, for Defendant-Appellee. Patrick Michael Kuhlmann, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the United States Attorney General, Washington, DC, Nickolai Gilford Levin, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae United States of America. Before PHILLIPS, MURPHY, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc of Defendant-Appellee Johns Manville Corporation. We also have a response from Appellant. Upon careful consideration of the petition and the response, we direct as follows.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 40, the petition for panel rehearing is granted in part to the extent of the modifications in the attached revised opinion. The court's August 21, 2023 opinion is withdrawn and replaced by the attached revised opinion, which shall be filed as of today's date. Because the court's decision to partially grant panel rehearing does not affect the outcome of this appeal, Appellee may not file a second or successive rehearing petition. See 10th Cir. R. 40.3.
The petition, response, and the attached revised opinion were transmitted to all non-recused judges of the court who are in regular active service. As no member of the panel and no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled, the request for rehearing en banc is denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).