From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp. v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2003
309 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-11101

Submitted September 10, 2003.

October 6, 2003.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Christopher Gonzalez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 19, 2001, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate and set aside a foreclosure sale held on June 18, 2001.

George M. Gavalas, P.C., Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Adolph H. Siegel, Lindenhurst, N.Y., for intervenor-respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA L. TOWNES, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant's contention, no basis exists to vacate and set aside the foreclosure sale either pursuant to CPLR 2003 or on the ground of fraud ( see Liberty Sav. Bank, FSB v. Knab, 281 A.D.2d 602). Accordingly, the motion was properly denied.

FLORIO, J.P., KRAUSMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp. v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2003
309 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp. v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORP., plaintiff-respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 727 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 268