From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Fritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 16, 1982
89 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

September 16, 1982


On the court's own motion, the decision and order (both dated September 7, 1982) in the above-captioned matter are amended nunc pro tunc so that the decretal paragraph reads as follows: Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by providing that there shall be a recomputation of the amount due Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Trial Term for entry of an appropriate amended judgment in accordance herewith. Mollen, P.J., Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Fritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 16, 1982
89 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Fritz

Case Details

Full title:CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Respondent-Appellant, v. PETER FRITZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 16, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)