From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charleston v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 11, 2015
171 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 2015)

Opinion

No. SC15–616.

06-11-2015

Derrick CHARLESTON, Petitioner v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.


Opinion

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Charleston v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 11, 2015
171 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 2015)
Case details for

Charleston v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derrick CHARLESTON, Petitioner v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

171 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 2015)