From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charleston Rancho, LLC v. Stanley Convergent Sec. Sols.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:18-cv-02205-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-02205-APG-VCF

01-06-2022

CHARLESTON RANCHO, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. Defendant, Third-party Plaintiff. v. AARROWHEAD SECURITY, INC., D/B/A VET-SEC PROTECTION, Third-party Defendant.

Peter B. Mortenson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5725 Richard Waltjen Nevada Bar No. 13416 MORTENSON & RAFIE, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff TYSON & MENDES LLP CHERYL H. WILSON Nevada Bar No. 8312 VICTORIA L. HIGHTOWER Nevada Bar No. 10897 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant AArowhead Security, Inc., d/b/a/ Vet-Sec Protection KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN LOGAN PC ROBERT N. LEMAY Texas State Bar No. 12188750 JAIME M. DEWEES, Texas Star Bar No. 24097593 Attorneys for Defendant Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.


Peter B. Mortenson, Esq.

Nevada Bar No. 5725

Richard Waltjen Nevada Bar No. 13416

MORTENSON & RAFIE, LLP

Attorney for Plaintiff

TYSON & MENDES LLP

CHERYL H. WILSON

Nevada Bar No. 8312

VICTORIA L. HIGHTOWER

Nevada Bar No. 10897

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant AArowhead Security, Inc., d/b/a/ Vet-Sec Protection

KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN LOGAN PC

ROBERT N. LEMAY

Texas State Bar No. 12188750

JAIME M. DEWEES, Texas Star Bar No. 24097593

Attorneys for Defendant Stanley Convergent Security Solutions, Inc.

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO PENDING MOTION (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff CHARLESTON RANCHO, LLC (“Plaintiff”), by and through its attorney of record MORTENSON & RAFIE, LLP, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Stanley”), by and through its attorneys of record, Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC, and Third-Party Defendant AArrowhead Security, Inc., d/b/a Vet-Sec Protection, by and through its attorney of record TYSON & MENDES LLP, hereby stipulate and jointly request that the court approve extension of time for Plaintiff to file a response to Stanley's Motion To Exclude Expert Testimony Of Plaintiffs Experts [ECF No. 98].

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Plaintiff to file a response to Stanley's Motion [ECF No. 98], currently set for January 3, 2022, will be extended to January 7, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Charleston Rancho, LLC v. Stanley Convergent Sec. Sols.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 6, 2022
2:18-cv-02205-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Charleston Rancho, LLC v. Stanley Convergent Sec. Sols.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLESTON RANCHO, LLC, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-02205-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 6, 2022)