From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles v. Moneygram International Walmart

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 9, 2011
Case No. 8:11-cv-636-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 8:11-cv-636-T-33TBM.

June 9, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun III's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 3), entered on May 12, 2011, recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint and that Plaintiff's construed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) be denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed any objections thereto.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983).

In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge and the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: ACCEPTED ADOPTED June 29, 2011. DENIED without prejudice.

(1) United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun III's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 3) is and . (2) Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. # 1) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint which sets forth a cause of action cognizable in this Court and which is consistent with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Failure to timely file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. (3) Plaintiff's construed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida


Summaries of

Charles v. Moneygram International Walmart

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jun 9, 2011
Case No. 8:11-cv-636-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Charles v. Moneygram International Walmart

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. CHARLES, JR., Plaintiff, v. MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL AND WALMART…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jun 9, 2011

Citations

Case No. 8:11-cv-636-T-33TBM (M.D. Fla. Jun. 9, 2011)