Charles v. H&R Block Bank

Full title: Jeanne E. CHARLES, Appellant, v. H & R BLOCK BANK, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Sep 10, 2014

149 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 4D13–2895.

09-10-2014

Jeanne E. CHARLES, Appellant, v. H & R BLOCK BANK, Appellee.

Ramon Rubio of the Law Office of Ramon Rubio, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Wm. David Newman, Jr. of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ramon Rubio of the Law Office of Ramon Rubio, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Wm. David Newman, Jr. of Choice Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this mortgage foreclosure case, we accept appellee's concession that the trial court erred in granting appellee final summary judgment because appellee did not properly serve pleadings, including an amended complaint, motion for summary judgment and hearing notice, on appellant at the designated e-mail address. Accordingly, we reverse this case and remand it to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and Remanded.

GROSS, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.