From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles v. Donahoe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2015
597 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-2171

03-19-2015

LYDIA A. CHARLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Defendant - Appellee.

Lydia A. Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC) Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lydia A. Charles, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lydia A. Charles appeals the district court's order denying relief on her complaint alleging that the United States Postal Service discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Charles leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charles v. Donahoe, No. 3:12-cv-00402-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Charles v. Donahoe

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 19, 2015
597 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Charles v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:LYDIA A. CHARLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 19, 2015

Citations

597 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2015)