From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles H. West Farms, Inc. v. Humes

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 9, 2006
906 A.2d 806 (Del. 2006)

Opinion

No. 84, 2006.

Submitted: February 27, 2006.

Decided: March 9, 2006.

Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Kent County, C.A. No. 05C-08-042.

Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.


ORDER


This 9th day of March 2006, it appears to the Court that:

(1) The defendant-appellant, Charles H. West Farms, Inc. ("West Farms"), has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42, to accept an appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court dated January 18, 2006. The Superior Court's order denied West Farm's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint on the ground that the statute of limitations had expired.

(2) West Farms filed its application for certification to take an interlocutory appeal in the Superior Court on January 27, 2006. The Superior Court denied the certification application on February 27, 2006.

(3) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court. In the exercise of its discretion, this Court has concluded that the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 42(b) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within interlocutory appeal is REFUSED.


Summaries of

Charles H. West Farms, Inc. v. Humes

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 9, 2006
906 A.2d 806 (Del. 2006)
Case details for

Charles H. West Farms, Inc. v. Humes

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES H. WEST FARMS, INC., Defendant Below-Appellant, v. CAROLYN MASTEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 9, 2006

Citations

906 A.2d 806 (Del. 2006)