From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles F. Noyes Company, Inc. v. Hadsell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 11, 1964
138 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. 1964)

Opinion

22538.

ARGUED JULY 13, 1964.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1964.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 109 Ga. App. 580 ( 136 S.E.2d 923).

Aaron Kravitch, Phyllis Kravitch, for plaintiffs in error.

James B. Blackburn, contra.


An individual and a corporation doing business as real estate brokers in another State, having jointly sued another individual in this State for a sum certain arising out of an agreement by and between such parties whereby the plaintiffs were to be paid for successfully interesting another, located in New Jersey, to join with the defendant and another party to the contract in forming a corporation, buying certain land in Savannah, Georgia, and developing a shopping center; and the Court of Appeals having held that the petition was fatally defective in seeking to recover for services as a real estate broker without alleging that the petitioners were "licensed real estate brokers in accordance with the requirement of Code Ann. §§ 84-1401 and 84-1413," the writ of certiorari was granted solely to review and determine whether or not that court was correct in so ruling. Held:

Notwithstanding the location of the land in Georgia and the provision in the contract that the petitioners were to be paid for "services as brokers," the promised services were not to sell, exchange, purchase, rent or negotiate the sale of real estate located in Georgia but to obtain a person or persons to join with the defendant in forming a corporation to purchase certain land in Savannah, Georgia, and developing a shopping center, and to be paid certain sums from the net proceeds received from defendant's ownership in said corporation. Thus the Court of Appeals clearly erred in holding that the petition was one to recover for services as a real estate broker in Georgia and subject to demurrer in failing to allege that the petitioners were licensed real estate brokers under the laws of this State. See Folsom v. Young Young, Inc., 216 F.2d 352; Tillman v. Gibson, 44 Ga. App. 440 ( 161 S.E. 630); Gray v. Georgia Real Estate Commission, 209 Ga. 301 ( 71 S.E.2d 645).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JULY 13, 1964 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 1964.


Summaries of

Charles F. Noyes Company, Inc. v. Hadsell

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 11, 1964
138 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. 1964)
Case details for

Charles F. Noyes Company, Inc. v. Hadsell

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES F. NOYES COMPANY, INC. et al. v. HADSELL

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 11, 1964

Citations

138 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. 1964)
138 S.E.2d 307

Citing Cases

Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell

Charles F. Noyes Co. v. Hadsell, 109 Ga. App. 580 ( 136 S.E.2d 923). On certiorari the Supreme Court reversed…