From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. Elrac, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.
Sep 8, 2017
65 N.Y.S.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)

Opinion

No. 2014–1871 Q C.

09-08-2017

CHARLES DENG ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., as Assignee of Gomez, Sotera, Appellant, v. ELRAC, INC., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Joseph D. DePalma, Esq.), for appellant. Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Joseph D. DePalma, Esq.), for appellant.

Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.

Present: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (William A. Viscovich, J.), entered July 1, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branches of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover for services billed under CPT codes 97810 and 97811.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

For the reasons stated in Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Gomez, Sarae v. ELRAC, Inc.(––– Misc.3d ––––, 2017 N.Y. Slip Op –––– [appeal No.2014–1869 Q C] ), decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. Elrac, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.
Sep 8, 2017
65 N.Y.S.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)
Case details for

Charles Deng Acupuncture, P.C. v. Elrac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES DENG ACUPUNCTURE, P.C., as Assignee of Gomez, Sotera, Appellant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.

Date published: Sep 8, 2017

Citations

65 N.Y.S.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Term 2017)