From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Charboneau v. Zriny

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Mar 24, 2014
No. 05-14-00313-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 24, 2014)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00313-CV

3/24/2014

DR. JANINE CHARBONEAU, D.V.M., Appellant v. LOURDES HILL ZRINY, ET AL., Appellees


On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-04035-2013


ORDER

This is an appeal from the trial court's February 21, 2014 interlocutory "order regarding service on defendants." It was filed March 10, 2014, within the twenty-day time frame allowed for appeals from interlocutory orders. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 28.1.

Asserting the trial court has not yet "granted [her] the right to appeal," appellant has filed a "motion for extension of time to accept amended notice of accelerated interlocutory appeal and/or notice of interlocutory appeal." Because the appeal was timely filed, we DENY the motion as moot to the extent it seeks an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). To the extent the motion seeks additional time for filing an amended notice of appeal, we DENY the motion as premature because the time for filing an amended notice of appeal has not lapsed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(g).

Although the notice of appeal was timely filed, we question whether we have jurisdiction over the appeal. Subject to a few mostly statutory exceptions, interlocutory orders are unappealable until a final judgment is entered. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Crop., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because it does not appear the trial court's February 21, 2014 order is appealable, we ORDER appellant to file a letter brief of no more than three pages addressing our concern. The brief shall be filed no later than April 3, 2014. Appellees shall file any responsive letter brief of no more than three pages no later than April 14, 2014. If either party relies on information not before this Court, that party must obtain a clerk's record from the trial court containing that information.

After it has received the jurisdictional briefs, the Court will either (1) order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction or (2) notify the parties that the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal and, if appropriate of any pending deadlines. Appellant is cautioned that failure to file the requested brief may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Charboneau v. Zriny

Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Mar 24, 2014
No. 05-14-00313-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Charboneau v. Zriny

Case Details

Full title:DR. JANINE CHARBONEAU, D.V.M., Appellant v. LOURDES HILL ZRINY, ET AL.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo

Date published: Mar 24, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-00313-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 24, 2014)