Opinion
Argued January 26, 1898
Decided March 1, 1898
Arthur Furber for appellant.
William L. Mathot for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except PARKER, Ch. J., not sitting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Chapuis v. Mathot
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1898
49 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1898)
Summaries of
Chapuis v. Mathot
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 1, 1898
49 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1898)
Case details for
Chapuis v. Mathot
Case Details
Full title:NICOLAS CHAPUIS, Appellant, v . MAY A. MATHOT, Impleaded, etc., Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 1, 1898
Citations
49 N.E. 1101 (N.Y. 1898)
155 N.Y. 641
Citing Cases
Matter of Sexton
The contention that usury is a personal defense and cannot be raised by the receiver of the legatee, is…
Durst v. Abrash( Williams v. Tilt, 36 N.Y. 319, 325.) The Court of Appeals has repeatedly reaffirmed this proposition, even…