From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chappell v. DUC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2676 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2676 KJM GGH P

01-05-2012

REX CHAPPELL, Plaintiff, v. DUC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 19, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, apparently using the services of another inmate.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 19, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. All defendants and claims in this action, except for the claim against defendant Strohmaier involving the handcuffs and being placed in a small holding cell, are dismissed.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Chappell v. DUC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 5, 2012
No. CIV S-10-2676 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Chappell v. DUC

Case Details

Full title:REX CHAPPELL, Plaintiff, v. DUC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2676 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2012)